Archive for air quality

Welcome back to the sustainable scribe for another edition of green news of the week featuring a few interesting green highlights from this past week. This week includes:  Al Gore smackdown on Obama over smog standards and pollution, Dell refocusing their green initiatives, 10 easy ways to make your campus green, the top 5 chemicals to avoid in food, Greenpeace fights for toxin-free products from major manufacturers, and 19 of the best organic and fair trade chocolates at the market.  Click on the link to read the full article.

Al Gore Criticizes Obama For Abandoning Smog Standards:  It’s Al Gore vs. President Obama.  Gore lambasted Obama when the President asked the EPA to withdraw proposed clean air regulations.  Here’s an excerpt from Al Gore’s blog site from yesterday: “Instead of relying on science, President Obama appears to have bowed to pressure from polluters who did not want to bear the cost of implementing new restrictions on their harmful pollution—even though economists have shown that the US economy would benefit from the job creating investments associated with implementing the new technology. The result of the White House’s action will be increased medical bills for seniors with lung disease, more children developing asthma, and the continued degradation of our air quality.”

Dell Backs Away from Carbon Neutrality, Focuses on Efficiency & E-Waste:  Dell has several sustainability initiatives and they just released their 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) report.  Their plans seem to be moving away from being carbon neutral and concentrating more on energy efficiency and improving e-waste collection, up 16% over last year according to the report.

10 Ways to Make Your Campus Green:  From carpooling to recycling to using reusable water bottles, there are several ways today’s campuses can go green.  This is a list of realistic green lifestyle changes students and faculties can incorporate into their daily routine to help preserve the environment.  “The green schools movement is the biggest thing to happen to education since the introduction of technology to the classroom.” – Glenn Cook, Editor in Chief, American School Board Journal

Top 5 Chemicals to Avoid in Food:  It’s important to examine the ingredients on the products you buy because food manufacturers don’t exactly prominently advertise the chemical content.  Whenever possible, buy organic food and avoid processed foods.  If there’s a label on it, inspect it thoroughly so you know exactly what you’re about to consume.   This is a list of 5 chemicals to avoid because of the associated risks ranging from weight gain to cancer.

Puma, Nike and Adidas Run Towards Toxin-Free Products With Greenpeace:  “Greenpeace recently released a report entitled Dirty Laundry which alleged that clothing from top brands like Adidas, Nike, Calvin Klein, H&M, Abercrombie & Fitch, Lacoste, Converse and Ralph Lauren are linked to facilities in China releasing toxic chemicals in our water.  Greenpeace’s Detox Campaign is asking manufacturers to offer toxin-free solutions to their customers and exercise transparency when it comes to discharging any chemicals into our environment.  Puma has already announced their intention to eliminate toxins from its entire supply chain and product lifecycle by 2020. 

19 of the Best Organic and Fair Trade Chocolates:  Do you have a sweet tooth for chocolate?  Well you don’t have to eat the processed version laced with chemicals.  The folks at the Daily Green have come up with a delectable list of 19 of the best organic and fair trade chocolates guaranteed to satisfy the taste buds of even the most discerning chocolate connoisseur.

Stay tuned next week for more green news stories from across the globe.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Which state is the worst offender when it comes to air pollution?  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) have come up with the ‘toxic 20′ highlighting the 20 US states with the most toxic air.  The NRDC report was compiled from data collected for the Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxics Release Inventory, which ranked the 20 worst states labelling them the “Toxic 20″ based on air pollution from power plants (which explained why smoggy California didn’t make the list).  Power plants are heavy polluters of the environment, plus they are constantly burning our already depleted supply of fossil fuels.

“Power plants are the biggest industrial toxic air polluters in our country, putting children and families at risk by dumping deadly and dangerous poisons into the air we breathe,” said Dan Lashof, director of the NRDC’s Climate Center.

The Toxic 20 States, with #1 (hello Ohio) being the most toxic:

Toxic 20 States - Smokestack outside Ford factory in Ohio - Photo: Joe Sohm/Getty Images

1. Ohio
2. Pennsylvania
3. Florida
4. Kentucky
5. Maryland
6. Indiana
7.Michigan
8. West Virginia
9. Georgia
10. North Carolina
11. South Carolina
12. Alabama
13. Texas
14. Virginia
15. Tennessee
16. Missouri
17. Illinois
18. Wisconsin
19. New Hampshire
20. Iowa

ABC news reported that Dr. John Spangler, a professor of family medicine at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C., said “he has found an association between the level of nickel in the air and the rate of hospitalization for childhood asthma in counties throughout North Carolina. Spangler’s continuous research also implied an association between airborne cadmium and cancer of the colon, prostate and lung.

“It’s hard to avoid the air you breathe,” said Spangler. “What do you do, stay inside?”

“I think it is important for people to know that their state has high levels of toxins in the air, but if you have a coal-fired power plant in your vicinity there’s not a lot you can do except move,” he said.  “If you know that air pollution is associated with a disease as severe as hospitalization for asthma, then there should be an effort to decrease the amount of toxins in the air,” he said. “And if the toxins in the air are related to coal power plants, we need to really rethink our coal policy.”

Read More→

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories : Go Green, Urban Living
Comments (2)
Jul
05

Quebec’s air quality standards revised

Posted by: Tim | Comments (2)

Few things that were introduced in 1979 stand the test of time, although that year marked my 12th birthday and the release of more great records than any year before or since (topped by London Calling by The Clash) one would hope that any environmental laws written at the tail end of the 1970s had long since become antiquities. I was amazed to see that wasn’t the case in Quebec, but I’ll argue the old maxim ‘ better late than never’.

After being in existence for 32 years I’m pleased to see that Quebec is changing its air-quality laws. I’m not picking on the province, in fact reading about this story made me wonder just how many air-quality laws in different places are as old as this one was and if so why wouldn’t they have been revised over the last three decades with our further knowledge about air-quality and the environment? It’s definitely something worth researching.

Quebec City soon will be under bluer skies

Quebec will be rolling out the new laws on June 30th and they will apply to almost 5,000 businesses, industries and institutions. Lawmakers feel that the new standards will greatly impact overall air-quality, plus lead to reductions in smog and acid rain. Stricter guidelines apply to the existing standards in addition to many new rules. Remarkably 80 new substances have been added to those that will be regulated many that have been proven to have negative health impacts. A new system of recording and reporting is also being put in place so that specific industries must report their results to the government. Specifically impacted by reporting standards are the steel, cement, aluminium and paper industries. New standards will also apply to companies that manufacture paint, printed goods and refineries.

Originally the intent was to implement the new rules in the during the past decade but the economic conditions experienced resulted in a delay as officials felt that industries already struggling with the business climate would not be well-positioned to implement the internal changes necessary to meet the new standards. I feel that is a wise decision when looking for businesses to support such important changes that will positively impact the environment. The process does allow businesses up to 2 years to meet new standards before fines would be levied.

Environmental groups are pleased with these developments as should be all residents of Quebec you will benefit from a cleaner and healthier environment. It certainly makes me ask when were the air quality standards where I live last changed and you should ask the same of your locality.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes