Archive for agriculture
Top 10 Greenest Countries
Posted by: | CommentsThe list of the top 10 greenest countries was compiled from the Environmental Performance Index (EPI). The development of the EPI was joint effort between Yale University (Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy) and Columbia University (Center for International Earth Science Information Network) in collaboration with the World Economic Forum and the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.
“The 2010 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) ranks 163 countries on 25 performance indicators tracked across ten policy categories covering both environmental public health and ecosystem vitality. These indicators provide a gauge at a national government scale of how close countries are to established environmental policy goals. The EPI’s proximity-to-target methodology facilitates cross-country comparisons as well as analysis of how the global community is doing collectively on each particular policy issue.”
According to the latest EPI results with a score out of 100, these are the top 10 greenest countries (click on the country to see their EPI score breakdown):
1. Iceland – EPI score: 93.5
2. Switzerland – EPI score: 89.1
3. Costa Rica – EPI score: 86.4
4. Sweden – EPI score: 86.0
5. Norway – EPI score: 81.1
6. Mauritius – EPI score: 80.6
7. France – EPI score: 78.2
8. Austria – EPI score: 78.1
9. Cuba – EPI score: 78.1
10. Colombia – EPI score: 76.8
Iceland bumped Switzerland from the #1 spot they held in 2008 as the top greenest country in 2010 due to its high scores on environmental public health and generating nearly all of its power from renewable sources (hydropower and geothermal energy), plus its control of greenhouse gas emissions. The United States fell to the 61st position, as compared to 39th in the 2008 EPI, Canada ranked 46th (12th in 2008), Russia 69th, China 121st, and India 123rd. The bottom 5 is 159th Togo, 160th Angola, 161st Mauritania, 162nd Central African Republic, and at the bottom in 163rd is Sierra Leone with an EPI score of 32.1. You can view the full list of all 163 countries here.
The EPI Indicators assessed in the ranking covers environmental health (water, air pollution, environmental burden of disease) and ecosystem vitality (climate change, forestry, fisheries, agriculture, biodiversity and habitat, air pollution, water). Ranging from CO2 emissions to water quality to pesticide regulations, many variables are taken into consideration. Refer to the pie graph below.
Both Canada and the US fell considerably from their 2008 EPI ranking. Let’s hope the next set of EPI results of the greenest countries sees remarkable improvement in North America.
______________________________________________________________________________
Planet Forward is an online retailer of ethically-made, earth-friendly products designed for everyday use with a distinctly urban feel. Products include reusable stainless steel bottles, stainless steel thermal travel mugs, waste-free lunch bags, reusable shopping bags, Make-it-Yourself toxin-free Green Cleaning kits, organic fashions and other accessories. SALE 50% OFF ALL PRODUCTS – SHOP NOW !
Urban Environmentalists Puzzled By London School Of Medicine
Posted by: | Comments
A recent study from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine has garnered a lot of attention and has many an urban environmentalist befuddled. So, what is causing all the fervor?
“Systematic review of literature over 50 years finds no evidence for superior nutritional content of organic produce. There is no evidence that organically produced foods are nutritionally superior to conventionally produced foodstuffs, according to a study published today in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.”
However, when it was dissected, repeated, posted and (re)tweeted, it came down to “Organically grown produce is no different than its cheaper pesticide laden counterpart”. You could hear the gasps of the urban environmentalists who had spent their hard earn dollars on Organic produce, ask was it all for naught? Well, this is not exactly true as the “review focused on nutritional content and did not include a review of the content of contaminants or chemical residues in foods from different agricultural production regimens”. Therefore even though the nutritional content of produce is the same no matter how it is grown, that does not mean that pesticides are now good for you. Therefore the urban environmentalist need not fear that the higher price they paid was for naught.
Tags: agricultural production, agriculture, chemical residues, contaminants, Crop Duster, garden, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London School Of Medicine, nutrition, nutritional content, organic food, organic gardener, organic gardening, organic produce, pesticide free, pesticides, planet forward, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, urban environmentalist
maligned by many people seeking to make political capital from the organization but I don’t think for one minute we should as collective citizens of whichever nation we’re from ignore just how much has been accomplished by what was always (and still remains) a noble concept. I also wonder if you realise that the UN also has a very active environmental body which is as it should be. The reality is that the UN Environment Programme is a large, active and industrious piece of the UN charter and is progressive in a truly global sense. Above and beyond the initiatives and action required to make inroads in terms of agriculture, emissions standards, rain forest concerns and so much more is the huge umbrella of unity that the UN brings to world leaders. So many UN backed principles will get foreign heads of state to participate as part of their obligation to the charter where otherwise these projects might be derailed, underfunded or worse still ignored. If you have time take a few minutes to visit the
that allows you to mine even more information from the program with relevancy to climate, land use and renewable energy possibilities. The tool was co-developed by the 

