Archive for 125 Green Tips
Reduce Emissions with the Top 10 Green Cars of 2011
Posted by: | CommentsWhat are the top green cars for fuel efficiency and performance? Well, the folks at Kelley Blue Book who have provided expert car reviews and advice for over 80 years have compiled a list of the top 10 green cars of 2011. From Ford to Lexus or Toyota to Nissan, there’s a green car on the list offering broad appeal.
An easy way to reduce emissions and your carbon footprint is to make greener choices when deciding on transportation. Yes, you can bike, walk, carpool or take public transport for the greenest options, but when driving your car is a necessity, consider driving green. There are a variety of green cars on the market today that will help reduce consumption and preserve fossil fuels.
A Jeep Grand Cherokee is one of the worst gas guzzlers out there (the Bugatti Veyron is the absolute worst), so if you’ve got your heart set on a Jeep next, then I guess driving greener hasn’t hit your priority list. For those who listen to their environmental conscience, check out this list of the top 10 green cars of 2011 (click on the link to learn more about each vehicle):
10) 2012 Ford Focus | fuel efficiency: 31 mpg (28 city/38 highway)
9) 2012 Fiat 500 | fuel efficiency: 33 mpg (30 city/38 highway)
8) 2011 Hyundai Elantra | fuel efficiency: 33 mpg (29 city, 40 highway)
7) 2011 Volkswagen Golf TDI | fuel efficiency: 34 mpg (30 city/42 highway)
6) 2011 Ford Fusion Hybrid | fuel efficiency: 39 mpg (41 city/36 highway)
Read More→
Artists donate music to Patagonia’s eco-friendly line
Posted by: | CommentsPatagonia, Inc have long been one of the most established names in eco-friendly clothing, the company founded in 1972 have always focused on outdoor wear with an emphasis on hiking, biking, cycling, swimming and surfing. It was fairly natural that they would be one of the earliest companies to lend lasting support to environmental initiatives both in their product line but also in the practices of the company. They’ve been involved with donating 1% of their total sales to environmental groups since 1985 over which time more than $25 million has been donated to different organizations. They also co-founded the ‘alliance 1% For the Planet’ for like-minded businesses and won the 2008 ‘Eco-Brand of the Year’.
Perhaps more importantly the company has strict environmental practices in place when it comes to the products that they manufacture, assessing raw materials and considering environmental impact for all products that they sell. The company also takes part in the ‘Common Threads Initiative’ (a recycling program) and the ‘Conservation Alliance’. The company has now introduced another avenue to support environmental funding with the launch of “Patagonia Music”.
Now their website will sell songs donated by artists for 99 cents each with the entire proceeds from each sale going to an environmental cause just as selected by the artist. The launch will feature 22 tracks by different artists and then a further four songs will be added on a weekly basis. In addition to downloads the compilations also be available as physical CDs (remember them?) at retail outlets.
More than 100 artists have already elected to contribute music to the campaign including Pearl Jam, Los Lobos, Drive By Truckers, Ziggy Marley, Maroon 5 and many more. The founder and owner of Patagonia stated in a press release:
“Patagonia is hopeful other musicians will see that by just donating a song they can easily provide their favorite environmental group with a new stream of financing.”
It’s a novel way for artists to support a cause that their fans will embrace while paying more than lip service to environmental issues. Now that the campaign has launched you can find out more plus purchase and download songs via the Patagonia.com website, an iPhone app or directly via each artists website in association with the company.
The War on Plastic Vol 4 – California contemplates plastic bag ban
Posted by: | CommentsWelcome to part four of an occasional series that I’ve titled ‘the war on plastic’ as I’ve made an unofficial decision that doing all possible to reduce the waste associated with plastic products is a huge part of our environmental responsibility. The war takes on many guises, from recycling to reduction, more educated consumption and the development of suitable and affordable alternatives. Few things are as synonymous with a society built upon convenience and disposable products as the continued rise of plastics. I have no debate that convenience is appealing but at what cost? That’s one of the topics we’ll continue to tackle in this series, for more information and the original post please visit here.
More good news in the battleground this month from the state of California that I feel happy and obliged to share. Over 500 California businesses have signed on in support of a plastic bag ban in the state.
The signatures have been collected by Environment California as many businesses elect to support cities in enacting bans of plastic bags. If approved city egislation would ban certain retailers from automatically offering plastic bags at the cash register. Environment California is a statewide, citizen-based environmental advocacy organization. They draw on 30 years of success in tackling the state’s top environmental problems. The companies that have signed represent a healthy cross-section of California business, many small retailers and restaurants, boutiques and convenience stores. Gina Goodhill from Environment California adds:
“From a business point of view, banning plastic bags makes sense, and these 500 signatures prove it”
Logic suggests that a decision that has economic and environmental benefits should be met with little resistance. Single use plastic bags costs retailers many hundreds of millions to provide, a cost that retailers of course currently cover. In truth of course those costs are transferred to the customer who doesn’t really need the bag in the first place. A typical supermarket is estimated to spend $20,000 to $70,000 on single use plastic bags at checkout. More and more retailers are promoting special savings for shoppers who use their own bag, or moving toward making sure a customer has to specifically request. Significantly The California Grocers Association, has firmly placed its weight behind the bill. The focus in an economy still in very slow recovery is firmly cost savings, perhaps not drawing on the aesthetic of plastic bag litter (so often ultimately destined via storms drains and rivers to the ocean) and ocean pollution as much as they could but still the proposition looks well supported.
Single use plastic bags of course not free, at around 3 to 3 1/2 cents per bag – the amount is being transferred into the shelf costs of the products you purchase. If you shop at 4 establishments per week and acquire 10 bags a week, those 500+ bags will cost you an extra $15-$20 per year. Even that quantity of bags may actually be much lower than the reality based on statistics. These numbers made my eyes bulge and inefficiency and waste becomes a vicious circle; in California an estimated 19 billion single use bags are used annually which in turn result in the state spending $25 million each year to clean up and landfill all of the bags. Once again you can guess where that $25 million has to come from.
Arguments against the ban suggest customers will be too greatly inconvenienced and the costs of reusable bags is prohibitive. In which case how did we cope before plastic bags? I went to two stores yesterday and was asked ‘do you think you’ll need a bag’ – of course not…and I somehow coped. More soon plastic battlers!
Learn far more about Environment California via their official site.

